Veyron SS - First Official Road Test

Discussion in 'European Cars' started by jnestory, Mar 2, 2011.

  1. #1 jnestory, Mar 2, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
  2. BAN REQUEST
     
  3. 0- 200 mph (322 Kph ) 5.8s better than F1: big difference but not impressive
     
  4. why
     
  5. He wants his own account banned because he finally realized he's a retard.
     
  6. it's like a GT-R.
     
  7. #7 mafalda, Mar 3, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
  8. #8 mafalda, Mar 3, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    400m 10.1s
    1 KM 18.0s <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/amazed.gif"></A>
    ...0-354 kPH 31.1S :
     
  9. It's a good article. And very nice pictures.

    EDIT: 20krpm is a lame piece of shit.
     
  10.  
  11. #11 Toine, Mar 3, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
  12. Banyou.jpeg
     
  13. #13 mafalda, Mar 4, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
  14. looks like it runs out of steam above 150mph
     
  15. TROLLOLOLOLOLOL
     
  16. #16 PGN1, Mar 4, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
  17. ...bugatti clamis improves Cx...
    Veyron SS can 431 Kph, it MUST better than standard veyron about Cx...
    has the Veyron SS the "top speed key"? if yes, did autocar use it?
     
  18. The conditions looked a little damp
     
  19. These numbers are ridiculously fast, what are you whining about?
     
  20. maybe... tested in winter...
     
  21. bugatti claims power +20% and improved CxS (and I 100% belive it: to improve max speed from 408 to 431 you need power and Cx too). I'd expect a batter 100-200 mph, it's "just" 0.8s better than 1001ps.
    Autocar writes "6.C windy": if windy means "against wind", it'd explain this. and it means.... SS'd be faster! <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/amazed.gif"></A>
     
  22. #22 Thebdm, Mar 4, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
  23. watching the full data

    60 2.6s
    100 5.0s
    120 6.6s
    130 7.6s
    147.9 10.1s
    150 10.2s
    160 11.8s
    170 13.7s
    180 16.2s
    183.4 18.0s
    190 19.4s
    200 22.2s
    210 26.0s
    220 31.1s



    something happened around 180mph

    170 -> 2.5s -> 180 -> 1.8s <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/amazed.gif"></A> -> 183.4 -> 1.4s -> 190 -> 2.8s -> 200
     
  24. Would rather have Aventador.
     
  25. 0-220 mph 31.1s without top speed key <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/amazed.gif"></A>
    "beyond that speed, we would have required the second key to keep the car's giant rear wing within the bodywork and, on the day, Bugatti deemed it unwise to do so because of a strong crosswind"
    I think SS'd under 30s with top speed key <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/amazed.gif"></A>
     

Share This Page