what a POSer car!!!!

Discussion in '1955 Imperial Convertible' started by CorollaRacer, Aug 10, 2002.

  1. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  2. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  5. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  6. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  7. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  8. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  9. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  10. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  11. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  12. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  13. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  14. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  15. Re: hahahaha

    shut up
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  16. Re: hahahaha

    You are going to be banned SLP.<!-- Signature -->
     
  17. Re: hahahaha

    ya i hope u r that is too much spam i mean 7 1/2 pages like come on u r supposed to obey the rules man<!-- Signature -->
     
  18. Re: hahahaha

    hahaha someone got frustrated at slow loading times =)

    CLICKY CLICKY CLICKY!!!<!-- Signature -->
     
  19. Fiero VS. MR2

    I heard these two were about same performance back then.
     
  20. Re: Fiero VS. MR2

    The base MR2 was good competition for the Fiero GT. The MR2 had the handling edge while the V6 Fiero was a little faster in the straights. The MR2 Supercharger (less expensive than the Fiero GT) did everything better than the top-of-the-line Fiero. But the base MR2 and top-of-the-line Fiero were close.<!-- Signature -->
     
  21. Re: Fiero VS. MR2

    my grandpa has the base fiero, and he let me drive it, and i can say...i would take any MR2 over ANY fiero... when he let me drive it, i floored it (from a dead stop at a stop light) and i thought some thing went wrong...it took it like an hour to get up to 45MPH...it could handel good...but every thing else sucked<!-- Signature -->
     
  22. Re: Fiero VS. MR2

    You gotta remembr though, fieros, when they came out were not meant to be sport cars, so they were no where near as fast as they could have been. they were brough to market as a sporty economy car, not a sports car. Also, in comparison to the MR2its kind of tough. The fiero basically reinvented the market that the MR2 was create for, and was built with the intent of beating the fiero in performance. Which is the better car thoug, my vote goes to the fiero.
     
  23. Re: Fiero VS. MR2

    the fiero has my vote till the end
     
  24. Re: Fiero VS. MR2

    probaly the feiro...but both are slow as hell.
     
  25. Re: Fiero VS. MR2

    my first car was a 1987 fiero 2.5 4cyl i love the cars and i always will they get my vote sure the mr2 are ok but can you put a 454 big block behind one of those......didnt think so
     

Share This Page