Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Other Countries' started by RLQ, Oct 29, 2004.
i drive this .. and no it isnt a dingo... Nor a kangeroo..
No its a renult Kangoo
You're a retarded stupid un-funny Kangoo.
and your some CS pl4y1n h4x dick.. so stfu and go h4x some people.
#%$get 1ll t3ll t3h 4dm1n
What the fUkc.
Would you like a glass of water to help calm you down a little?
The '90s Commodores weren't that bad in Fuel economy were they? I thought the GM V6 was pretty good.
Hell it has to better than my Falcon...
Last fill up cost $81, expected range = 450km
When I had my VP V6 I was getting 12L/100km out of it (525km for 63L tank).
450km / 65L = 14.4L/100km
its because toyotas sells commercial vehicles and is the best 4WD and AWD maker selling in Aus.
I'm getting about 14.0L/100km in my LS1 at the moment.
I know someone who was getting 200km per tank from their auto V6 VN. Another person I know with a manual V6 VS gets a bit over 300kms per tank.
Any particular reason? engine mods? poor servicing?
VS has an ecotech engine, obviously not the soul reason but it goes someway maybe?
Could have a heavy foot...VS's only have 59L tanks, could be a basic EFI problem.
Still, LS1 engine > crappy '89 Falcon EFI 6
aussi people mostly drive corollas, falcons, holdens, mercs, bmw, and wolks
I would have thought that engine would get better economy if it was running right and nothing wrong with it. Or is it only a 3sp auto or something?