Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Car Comparisons' started by Uaz, Nov 27, 2007.
The mk2 with the 1,8l 16v 139hp engine was pretty good.
1,2....5. Definitly rock a clean 1 or 2 though.
although mk4 with tinted rear lights, front mount intercooler and dropped looks so awesome.
Golf V GTi .
n.I is the real deal. then II and V.... III & IV
Why do people like the 5 so much? It looks like a Nissan Murano stock. Although there are some nice ones out there and the exahust can sound really good. The 2.0s FSIs.
too lazy to look it up
Best VW's GTi ever built IMO
Also loved the MK1, still do, hence why I use it as a daily.
i own a Mazdaspeed 3. and I think it is much nicer than the GTI.
to keep standard = 5
to modify = 2
If those older would also be "new" then Mk1. But it would be a decent fight against the latest one.
Mk5 would be the choice if you have the money, otherwise mark 4, mark 3s are shit/the worst. Golfs are fanboi material inwhich case the mark 1 is acceptable
Wtf? Change your name already then. Not owning the car you use for your name is insta-bannable material.
no, it's not much nicer than a gti.
you and rabbit can be butt buddies
Mk.5 but in White and with the retro seats.
205 GTI 1.9
but a MK1 Golf is fine too
4 looks best maybe.
2 for sure though.
5 2 1 4 3
1 > 5432