Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

Discussion in '2002 Ford Focus SVT' started by DodgeFreak, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. The 2004 Dodge SRT-4 Neon, is a 1.8L Turbo, with 205hp and almost the same amount of torque, and does 0-60 in 2.4 sec. I like the looks a lot better too, but that point is my opinion. That neon looks completely different from the old one. Don't want to make any Ford fans mad though.
     
  2. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    SORRY SORRY SORRY, it doesn't do 0-60 in 2.4, it does it in 5.9, I had the Hennesy Venom 800 TT on my mind, and I typed that out, sorry for the incorrect info guys.
     
  3. #3 DodgeFreak, Aug 9, 2002
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
  4. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    D@mn, I just can't get my facts straight! It's a 2.4L turbo, not 1.8L, wow, long days work, sorry for any incovenience!
     
  5. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    The SRT-4 Neon is a 2.4L Turbo, that produces 205 horse, and about the same amount of torque, and it does 0-60 in 5.9. It could stomp this, yet it's not on this sight.
     
  6. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    oh who cares? it's a neon. I say both shouldn't be on the site, that'll make it even!<!-- Signature -->
     
  7. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    I agree that neither should be on the sight, but if this slow thing is on here, how come the 2003 Dodge SRT-4 Neon, that looks faster and performs better isn't on here?
     
  8. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    The SRT-4 neon is 230 some hp and isnt in the same class as the focus svt. It would be more in the range of the 250 hp awd RS focus
     
  9. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    I know, I'm just saying, if something this slow is on here, how come something faster and (in my opinion) better looking isn't on here?
     
  10. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    the SC.net staff are probably working on getting the SRT-4 listed, so give them a break, they deserve it<!-- Signature -->
     
  11. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    Yes, they do deserve a break, this is one hell of a sight, I would just like to see some old muscle cars such as... the hemicudda, 440 6 pack chargers, road runners, chevelles, novas, camaros....<!-- Signature -->
     
  12. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    First off, YES! I am a Ford man. I drive a Ford, and I work at Ford. The thing on your Neon, is this... yeah, it's a fast fxcker, but.... turbo charged. The SVT Focus is N/A! N/A BABY!
     
  13. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    umm, the RS Focus is FWD and only has 220bhp.
    Please check your facts.


    As for the neon, i think the real reason why it is not yet on this site as it is not yet a production car while the SVT Focus has been on the market for a few months now. I may be wrong as not all of the cars on here are production or anything more than one-offs but that seems like th most logical reason to me.

    Oh and for the record, i'm not a Ford guy(i actually do not like ford CARS), i do own a focus but i'm not a big fan of the SVT.
     
  14. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    they do have the 70 Hemi Cuda, and a 66 cuda, check them out

    and I think the reason they have eluded to the Neon SRT-4 is because dodge has so maney other sweat cars and Ford has so few <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/wink.gif"></A> <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
     
  15. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    ummmmm what ever. hey to the people who think that this shouldn't be on here go to the buick skylark and look at the 0-60. it's a 13 second car!......... on wait i mean it goes 0-60 in 13 seconds. any how i think that this SHOULD be on here along with the SRT-4
     
  16. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    They have a ton of cars to add, this is just one of many
     
  17. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    How bout SRT-4 versus Focus RS? Don't u think it's a better comparison in terms of engine power? The SRT-4 has 215hp and 245lb/ft of torque, and the RS has 225hp. Both do the 0-60mph in around 6.0 seconds. The Focus's habdling is extremely awesome, i'm not sure about teh SRT-4 though.
     
  18. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    the SRT-4 isn't out even out yet and it does look like Motor Trend, Car and Driver ect, are racing out to test it. so it might be a while....
     
  19. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    Motor Trend just did a First Drive, And they do 0-60 w/a stopwatch for the drives, so I guess they got it first.
     
  20. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    whats funny is the neon has 215 hp with a supercharger, base engine is probably 130 hp, im not to familiar with neons engine, but anyways, the focus is 170 hp, not only with out the supercharger, but can out handle this POS of a car anyday. slap a supercharger on the focus, shabam, owns the SRT-4. not to mention the styling of a focus is aggressive and looks damn good.
     
  21. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    ummm the neon is actually being tested to accelerate at and i quote "Subaru WRX worthy" level. 0-60 5.6, its a kickin ass car, and i love it!
     
  22. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    the neon is crap, 2.4 litre turbo and only 215hp, what a crock of shit, honda civic type-r has a 2.0litre naturally aspirated engine which pumps out 200hp, or how about the Honda S2000 it has a 2.0litre naturally aspirated engine and pumps out a hugely massive record breaking 250hp thats 125hp per litre! The NEON is shite!!!
     
  23. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    I'm gonna ignore that comment, you jus want me to get mad! But hey, a car doesn't have to be superfast (as people like jagkid think) to be cool!
     
  24. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    I'd like to see a race between the two.
    Yeehaww
     
  25. Re: Why this but no SRT-4 Neon?

    SVT should spend more time on building real cars and not import competition, but if they are gonna work on it, they need more HP because this car isnt gonna have a chance against its competitiors such as the SRT-4 or the RSX-S, not only does it need more HP but it also needs the torque!
     

Share This Page