0-60 is more like 4.8

Discussion in '2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK32 AMG' started by G1zm0, Aug 10, 2002.

  1. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    u ppl are all so full of SHIT<!-- Signature -->
     
  2. ...but I suppose M-B is trying to avoid what Infiniti had happen with their Q45 numbers.<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    I've seen 0-60 times like 4.5 to 4.9 more often of various car mags than 5.1 secs...i personally believe that this car would do sub-5 secs anyday.<!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    yeah its 4.8 and the c is 4.9
     
  5. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    I will get the exact specs. My aunt has one. I will try to get her to floor it. And I will time it. No worries
     
  6. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from FerrariV12</i>
    <b>I will get the exact specs. My aunt has one. I will try to get her to floor it. And I will time it. No worries</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->um?.......lol
     
  7. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    IŽve driven it, and ive seen it in a 1/4 mile race.
    it does 0-60 in 4.6 secs
    1/4 mile 13.0 - 13.4 secs (it raced 3 times, once against a Yamaha R6 bike, and won!.... and just to add, a guy driving a BMW M roadster got afraid to race against it)
    When u are at 0 km/h, and u floor it, u just feel all your intestins and organs moving to your back and then going up!! its just amazing.

    <!-- Signature -->
     
  8. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    im tellin the truth. I drove it cause i worked at the dealer here in my country. There was a "Rally" that was really a show of classic and sports cars and then there was a 1/4 mile event.

    It ran against a mitsubishi lancer evolution (there was said that the lancer had NOS, i couldnt confirm this), against the yamaha R6 (i think the guy from yamaha gave him like half a second of advantage)and in both it won.

    The SLK owner told the bimmer guy to race, a bet of $10 grand, and he got afraid and didnt run.<!-- Signature -->
     
  9. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    i don't think its faster then a bike, but hey, definitly faster then a BMW M roadster <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
     
  10. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    donno
     
  11. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    Having had a ride in one of these, while racing a normal SLK320, as well as having raced robot-to-robot against one last night in my E36 M3 (310 hp stock), I can safely say that this car is very fast. I'd watch out for it when driving most stock BMWs - can't comment on the M Roadster though we don't have them in this country - only M Coupe's. I might also add that I didn't lose the race last night by too much - I'll have to prowl the streets for a re-match!
     
  12. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    finally some1 that isn't full of it <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
     
  13. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    Sub5 0-60 speeds.....thats awesome.....now i wanna go out and test drive one of these
     
  14. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    there is no way he would lose to an R6 in a fair race, the R6 dose the 1/4 in 10.46 sec.
     
  15. Re: 0-60 is more like 4.8

    The M3 might have problems beating the SLK 32! But I'm not sure, it would be a close race!
     

Share This Page