2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

Discussion in '2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S' started by love of cars, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    CC 8S will win.
     
  2. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    MClaren F1 all the way,this thing is too ugly,lol
    I care about a car's appearence not just performance heh.
    To me a supercar has to not only go really fast but look good doing it heh.
    So anyways I choose THe Mighty f1 .
    Umm anyways Imports Rule!!!
     
  3. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    damm u guys get worked up, ppl who know actually about cars say the mclaren f1 wins, ppl who dont tend to say the koeningsegg. simple as that

    to the kid who "designs cars" your a joke! worked for ferrari! ha!! u worked for mclaren! DOUBLE HA! what a joke ,if u are gonna lie be realistic! when u say u design cars, u mean u sit in your bedroom and draw pictures of cars,then slap a ferrari badge on it and say " uhh duh i work for ferrari" please kid grow up

    the stats we are using to compare cars with are wrong the koeningsegg doesnt do 3.4 ... i read a report sayin it only did 3.8 and 232mph , not 240

    but again u cant fairly test the mclaren by saying it would get beaten on a track, cause the mc f1 is not a race car , its the ultimate everyday supercar! 3 seats!! same boot space as a ford fiesta and althought it may only go 230mph with the revlimiter on thats still ridiculos in my view <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A> and i have sat in one, i am 6, foot tall, i wasnt crapmed at all!! plenty of room, and bucket seats <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
     
  4. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Koenigsegg, ffcourse, The Mclaren is old.
     
  5. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    I'm a Mclaren fan through and through - but I have to admit the Koenigsegg is an awesome motor. I heard 3.4secs was the 0-100km (0-62) time so it's only fractionally off the Mclaren to 60. It'd definitely be a close race in a straight line, and I wouldn't like to guess the winner.

    One thing though, if the CC is faster, will it be the king for as long as the Mclaren has been? Probably not, IMO...
     
  6. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    McLaren (just)
     
  7. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Koenigsegg for me <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
     
  8. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Koenigsegg for me <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
     
  9. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Koenigsegg may be cheaper,but it's not better looking than the Mclaren!This thing(Koenigsegg)looks retarded espacialy from the back view,#$%#ing hideous,what is that,lol?
    I would Rather have a Mclaren F1 over this anyday!
     
  10. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    This one handles waaay better
     
  11. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    You're done.
     
  12. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    And you're done.
     
  13. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Defenitely Koenigsegg. It runs 10 sec 1/4 mile and McLaren runs mid 11's. Thats a 1.5 second difference and its a huge one at that. Koenig has my vote on speed and looks.
     
  14. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    my dibs are on the cc 8!!!
     
  15. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    THE McCLAREN WOULD FUK THIS CAR LIKE A CHEAP 2 DOLLAR SLUT ON X.
    THE McCLAREN LOOKS BETTER AND THIS SITE IS WRONG THE McCLAREN HAS A MAX SPEED OF 249.3 MPH
    BESIDES IVE SEEN CRIPPLES SLOTHS THAT MOVE FASTER THAN THAT UGLY **** HOLE.
     
  16. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Woah, calm down kid. You evidently know not what rules are here on this site, esp. while I'm around.
    It's only a matter of your opinion to keep to yourself, not to make yourself a fool and post such a stupid post.
    Grow up and do some more reading and research before you come back to post at this site.
    Now, hopefully you have calmed down and you are no longer a little kid now, lets be mature about it. Let me ask you this......
    ......Where did you find the "max speed of 249.3 mph" ??
    Reply soon.
     
  17. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    I like the pic.
    I have this car on SEGA GT2002(X-Box).
    It's pretty fast and manuverable.
     
  18. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    I would say the CC would win and the McLaren would come in a close second. Rememeber, look at the CC's skidpad. 1.15 is insane, the dauer is like around that, lower i belive. All cars are demons, its just that i belive in my opinion that the CC would win.
     
  19. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    I would say the CC would win and the McLaren would come in a close second. Rememeber, look at the CC's skidpad. 1.15 is insane, the dauer is like around that, lower i belive. All cars are demons, its just that i belive in my opinion that the CC would win.
     
  20. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    I would say the CC would win and the McLaren would come in a close second. Rememeber, look at the CC's skidpad. 1.15 is insane, the dauer is like around that, lower i belive. All cars are demons, its just that i belive in my opinion that the CC would win.
     
  21. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Well, we are all entitled to opinion here...
    I am a big McLaren fan myself, but, it just might be that the CC8S would win.
    We just need test reports, that's what I'm waiting for.
     
  22. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    I READ IN AND ISSUES OF TOP GEAR MAGAZINE THEY DID A SPECIAL EDITIONON ON THE McCLAREN THEY PUSHED THE CAR TO ITS LIMITS AND IT MAXED OUT AT 249.3 MPH, TO PUT IT IN LAMENS TERMS FOR SOME OF YOU PEOPLE WHO MIGHT BE A LITTLE SLOW (NOT TRYIN TO MENSION ANY NAMES)THE McCLAREN WOULD SMOKE THIS CAR LIKE A CRACK HEAD WHO STUMBLED ON A KILO OF WEED. THE CC IS A GOOD CAR BUT COMES NO WHERE NEAR THE HANDLING CAPABILITIES OF A McCLAREN ON THE TRACK WHERE IT COUNTS.
     
  23. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Ok, well, incase you havnt noticed.....the CC is almost as fast, it doesnt make the CC sucky compared to the Mac. I'm sorry, but you're putting your liking for the Mac waaaaaay over the limit comparing it to the CC. You just need to open your mind to facts and figures, just like anyone else.
     
  24. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    WELL THE CC IS ALMOST AS FAST AS THE MAcCLAREN- THOSE ARE THE TRUE WORDS OF A LOSER GIVE IT UP AS LOND AS YOUR DRIVIN THE CC EXPECT TO BE LOOKIN AT THE REAR PLATES OF A MAcCLAREN AS IT MOVES OVER THE HORIZEN LEAVIN YOU IN THE DUST.
    YOUR ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT I MUST BE A DUMB AZZ COMPARIN THE MACC TO THE CC YOU CANT COMPARE A CC TO A MACC THERES NO COMP THE MACC FASTER HANDLES BETTER ON THE TRACK WHERE IT COUNTS AND AL-AROUND LOOKS BETTER IM NOT SAYIN THE CC SUCKS I WOULD PUSH IT SUPER CARS A ART WORK TO ME BUT COMPARIN A CC TO a MACC IS LIKE COMPARIN A FINGER PAINTING TO A VANGO!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  25. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    CC has a faster top speed actually. Koenigsegg did testing and got over 250mph. And WHY do all the people on this site argue that horsepower and torque are everything!!!!! Sure it is a good indication but when a car has a 0.30 cd it cuts through the air like a hot knife through butter. this thing went 230 in the rain on a warm up run w/o even breaking a sweat! The McLaren is at an obvious disadvantage anyway, operating on old technology. The McLaren's hayday is over boys, and its time for a new champ!
     

Share This Page