2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAHAHAH

Discussion in '1966 Dodge D/Dart Super Stock' started by Keanumon, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from KaNe</i>
    <b>This will be one hell of a battle between the Silverado SS and the SRT-10!!!!!!, even though i love chevy's im gonna have to hand this one to Dodge cuz u just cant beat a 8.3 liter engine!!!!

    The SRT-10 its just a Monster on wheels!!!!!

    But the Silverado SS does seats 5-6 people unlike the SRT seats 2 maybe 3<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">

    The Lightning its an ok truck but its only a 2 seater and it will get outmatched by these monsters<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">

    PS The 1st fast truck was the Psyclone ok Ford guys, so dont be saying that the lightning is still "original" or any other BS! The Psyclone was created By General Motors back in '92</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Actually the lightning is a 3 seater, But this car is way cooler then the lightning.<!-- Signature -->
     
  2. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    this sucks more<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    <!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    Thank's for the info., the ram clearly wins. You can talk price and everything, but when it comes down to it, the Ram wins.
     
  5. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    Kane the first sport truck was the ford ranchero. chevy sport truck was the el camino. the ranchero debuted back in the late fifties. the el camino in the sixties. now i agree with the cyclone being a awesome sport truck, but it is not the best and it is not the first! so stop shooting your mouth off about your opinions that you have tried your hardest to make everyone believe are facts!
    Have a nice day!
    LONG LIVE MUSCLE CARS!
     
  6. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    i am a huge ford lightning fan....but....i would have to hand this one over to dodge....it is truly a monster on wheels and you just cant top a 10cyl 8.4 liter engine
     
  7. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    if your talkin about old fast trucks what about the lil red express
     
  8. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    its n 8.3 liter, but that besides the point it will use lightnings to wipe its ass with, chevy had a cool idea with the ssr but after i saw 1 i found out how shitty it looked
     
  9. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    84812, the el caminos first year was 59, just to set the records straight. that was their best looking year too........ besides, neither wree "sport trucks" if that's what they were at all, until the muscle car era in the late 60s when they got the big blocks in them, before and after that, they were just trucks that drove like a car.

    as for the origional post, i would pick srt-10, lightning, harley davidson F150, then ss, because the ss is not that good looking at all.

    the harley cuz it is sweet looking and fast.
     
  10. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    ok yall are not looking at all of the stats
    the svt lightning may have less hp but look at the torque it will rip the pants off of any other truck out their. and also look the srt 10 is only geting what 63 hp per liter wile the lightning is getting 80 some odd and the chevy ss is a bold faced lie they dont even have it yet its still in the consept stage for the longest time. do a little exaust work and intake and came work you would still be keeping the price of lightning under the srt 10 and you would have a faster better looking truck.
     
  11. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    actually the first fast truck was by far the Lil'red express that will out perform ever the vette of the same vintage
     
  12. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    you didnt take one thing into consideration, yes the lightning has more hp per liter but it is supercharged and short of adding nitrous and a couple of other things like headers and an intake possibly an exhaust you cant mod that truck anymore the SRT-10 is NA naturally aspirated and has so much untapped pontential with 500hp and 500ftlb of torque STOCK, its just foolish to say that a lightning would smoke a SRT-10, yes granted there are exceptions i have personally seen an 11 sec. lightning. they are not to be underestimated yet this new dodge will rule the streets for now atleast.<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">
     
  13. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    i agree with insanejuggaloc. i like the dodge.... lots of power and lots and lots of room for mods! :)
     
  14. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    This Dodge would smoke any truck out there, and as for the lighting, it doesnt even stand a chance against this. The Silverado SS is still pretty awesome, but this truck takes the cake.<!-- Signature -->
     
  15. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from KaNe</i>
    <b>This will be one hell of a battle between the Silverado SS and the SRT-10!!!!!!, even though i love chevy's im gonna have to hand this one to Dodge cuz u just cant beat a 8.3 liter engine!!!!

    The SRT-10 its just a Monster on wheels!!!!!

    But the Silverado SS does seats 5-6 people unlike the SRT seats 2 maybe 3<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">

    The Lightning its an ok truck but its only a 2 seater and it will get outmatched by these monsters<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">

    PS The 1st fast truck was the Psyclone ok Ford guys, so dont be saying that the lightning is still "original" or any other BS! The Psyclone was created By General Motors back in '92</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --> Actually the first 'fast trucks' were the Chevrolet El Camino and the Ford Ranchero (They're reffered to as muscle trucks) and were built in the 60's not 1992. Just thought I'd let you know that trucks weren't just invented.<!-- Signature -->
     
  16. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    Yeah I gonna say that the dodge is got the best Idea here, ford lightning isn't even close, the SilvaradoSS is closer by far than ford, and the SilvaradoSS is good looking, but this top them all!!

    "A real deal powertruck"
     
  17. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    Yea it can have more mods but thats going to suck your wallet dry, when the chevys v-8 can be modifid easily and willnt hurt your budget to much too
     
  18. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    id have to say if chevy made it the SS would take both those other trucks in a race. I mean look at the performance chevy gets out of its cars. They got a 350, 385, and 405 hp 8 cylinder engines in the vettes and they're hauling right with or past the viper. And your looking at 2 less cylinders and anywhere from 100 less hp to 45. THis trucks only what, 20 behind the SRT-10? Besides dodge trucks are so bulky. Id give it to the silverado, again thats if they make it.
     
  19. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    you people are retarded, for the most part. whast wrong with supercharging? that will give it a better platform to tune, because the supercharger is already bolted on. the lightning is so much cheaper than the dodge that it isnt even really comparable. you havent seen any true performance numbers either, except for the lightning, so shaddup until you do n00bs.<!-- Signature -->
     
  20. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    wow, .6 sec quicker. that just shows about dodge and engineering. that much more power and that much faster, not to mention we still don't know the track time and if it can beat a lightening witch is known as sport car performer around the track than i will say it better. ohh by the way i bet you money in most street races the ford will win. i all let you figure it out why( its a quiet a simple thing). and that chevy can go to hell the day its production the day i will count it.
     
  21. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    ok this isnt even being made so how can you compare it to SVT.
     
  22. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    ARE YOU GUYS OUT OF YOUR MIND? Sure, this is the SS out perform the SVT. But you seemed to overlook one small problem. THESE ARE CONCEPTS. RIGHT NOW I COULD WALK INTO MY LOCAL FORD DEALER AND BUY A SVT LIGHTING. CAN YOU SAY THE SAME FOR THIS OR THE SILVERADO? NO! You could make a concept truck that had a damn rocket on the back and did the 1/4 mile in 8 seconds! Atleast ford has the balls to make a good truck and actually produce it.
     
  23. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from mariowrc</i>
    <b>wow, .6 sec quicker. that just shows about dodge and engineering. that much more power and that much faster, not to mention we still don't know the track time and if it can beat a lightening witch is known as sport car performer around the track than i will say it better.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    No posted track times, but I hae these figures:

    Ram SRT-10 Speed through slalom: nearly 70mph (69.7 I think is the excat number which is 2mph faster than a porsche 911 turbo)

    Lightning Speed through slalom: 61.3 mph

    Ram SRT-10 Lateral Acceleration: 0.92g's

    Lightning Lateral Acceleration: 0.875g's


    Stock Figures:

    0-60:

    5.0 seconds - Ram SRT-10
    5.8 seconds - Lightning

    1/4 mile:

    12.9 seconds - Ram SRT-10
    13.9 seconds - Lightning

    Top Speed:

    150mph - Ram SRT-10
    142mph - Lightning



    does 0-100mph-0 in 18 seconds.
    in a test done in 2001 by motor trend, the lightning went 0-100 in 15.2 seconds, which only leaves 2.8 seconds for it to get back down to 0, which probably won't happen. Especially considering that a Dodge Dually with the upgraded brakes (2002), will break in less time/space than a Lightning :D (Again from a motortrend mag the big-block shootout I think it was where they had 3 duallys 1 ford, 1 chevy, 1 dodge).



    As for price, they said it would be priced to compete with the lightning when it comes into production, so hopefully it shouldn't be too far off.

    As for the Silverado SS, the extra weight of the Extended cab would more than likely offset performance, but I still like it. =)<!-- Signature -->
     
  24. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    lmfa @ ford, the lightning would last a whole 2 seconds..lol<!-- Signature -->
     
  25. Re: 2002 Silverado SS Vs 2002 SRT-10 VS 2002 SVT Lightning(HAHAH

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from JAvery20</i>
    <b>id have to say if chevy made it the SS would take both those other trucks in a race. I mean look at the performance chevy gets out of its cars. They got a 350, 385, and 405 hp 8 cylinder engines in the vettes and they're hauling right with or past the viper. And your looking at 2 less cylinders and anywhere from 100 less hp to 45. THis trucks only what, 20 behind the SRT-10? Besides dodge trucks are so bulky. Id give it to the silverado, again thats if they make it.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->


    Actually, my friend and I raced a Chevrolet Z71 with a 350 (5.7L) in it, we barely beat it, then my friend raced me in my dad's 2002 Ram 1500 SLT with the 360 (5.9L) and I kicked his ass. There was nothing different, same car, same everything. 10ci wouldn't make that big a difference, it's just plain and simple, the Ram is faster. I'm not dissin' Chevy (next to Dodge it's my favorite). I just think that this Ram would take both the lightning and the SS Silverado.
     

Share This Page