I never said GT-R is NOT masterpiece. I was always referred about power, and C/D early mule's power as well. I surely overstated blaming the record mule about power, I know it, but the C/D car was useless to justify something unjustifiable. The other facts were concerning some very old threads, I rememebr few of them, one was regarding Euro spec F40, he claimed it was slower than a fleet of cars. Insisting referring tests of Ford GT, Saleen, CGT, favourable tests trying to conclude, when in real world the F40 run at the side of to Enzo into speeds from 60-130 mph, also confirmed by owners. Or, the Zonda's 0-170 star tour, a very fast uncorrected 160-170 time printed by a UK mag, valid for him to prove, but later unconfirmed by any F version, ClubSport or CGT as performance. Surely faster cars (when the 120-130 C/D time was uncorrect he was quick to learn it referring it to GT-R <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A> ). The F1 XP4 fitted with a weak engine, simply unconfirmed by the older F1 site. The history said that it was the car fitted with the definitive 627 PS engine. And so on. It was well known but, arguing again. Like well known is the insistence giving not you any hope or alternative if your are no collimating with its theories. Recently he point out something like high powerful engines concerning press 599 GTB or 458 tested by Italian magazines, after Harris case, but unconfirmed by the 599GTO performance and the 458 dynoed. I agreed concerning what other Harris said. Coming back to C/D GT-R's case, it was arguing for long cause of nothing really to prove and compare with it because tested so particular, concerning altitude, conditions.. and so on. Anyway was well visible it was a fast car tested, really behind this particular condition. Correction factor was his weapon of defense, enough to legitimately conclude something about that car, to slow it and gave a sense, irreversible theory cause of the renowned of the mag. Now that the correction factor is declining sense because of the newer GT-R tested in exactly the same condition what do we do with that C/D 485 hp test mule theory so close to claimed? Anyway he is a great guy. Available in sharing scans. A great source in some cases.