Brabus SLR McLaren Vs. Nissan GT-R

Discussion in '2008 Nissan GT-R' started by Timmy T, Oct 17, 2007.

  1. I've got a friend who believes the Nissan GT-R is the ultimate. Well, I wanna know from you guys which car will win. And please give proper reasons.


    (Which will be the SLR McLaren. Trust me)
     
  2. The GT-R will win because the turbo>>>>>the zoopercharger. That's common knowledge, everyone noes dat.
     
  3. Ferrari F40
    Honda S2000
     
  4. Itz teh GT-R fTW, you n00ber.
     
  5. straight line -- Brabus SLR
    track -- GTR

    but you shouldn't compare these two cars. There is a huge ($400K+) price difference between these 2 cars. It's like comparing a Mustang with a Ford GT.
     
  6. mustangs faster
     
  7. YOUR FRIEND IS A FAGGOT THAT IS WHY
     
  8.  
  9. This is like comparing a Z06 to an F430... oh, wait...
     
  10. This is like comparing a Z06 to an F430... oh, wait...
     
  11. different price bracket, different target consumer, different philosophies behind each respective vehicle. try comparing a Lancer Evo with a Lamborghini Murcielago--or a highly modded Honda Civic vs. a Ferrari F430. What's the point?

    If two random people, one driving an SLR and the other driving the GTR, meet at a stoplight, I'm pretty sure the SLR would have a slight advantage. If they go out on a track day, the GTR will probably own simply due to its track-oriented calibration, nimbler chassis, better balance, less understeer, dual-clutch manual transmission etc.
     
  12. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/angry.gif"></A>Honda F40<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/angry.gif"></A>
     
  13. Shitty comparison, Brabus SLR and '07 GTR.
     
  14. A stock SLR will completely destroy this car, on a drag race or around the track, bad comparison
     
  15. First off, why even compare the two? But I think the ultimate car out of the two would be this GTR simply because of the cost-effectiveness. That SLR costs over 10 times as much as this GTR does yet the GTR has a better 0-60 time and weighs less. Thats pretty sad when this little ol' TT'd 3.8L V6 with only 473hp/434trq is out-performing a boosted 5.4L V8 with 626hp/575trq in its weight class.

    To me, the only thing worth anything near 800k would be the Veyron, now thats ultimate.
     
  16. WRONG!!! VEYRON has too much traction and roof stability. It loses a zer0-60 match.
     
  17. RIGHT!!!! I was talking in terms of it being worth $800k you dingus! Never said anything about 0-60.
     
  18. Nice avater.

    The GTR is in every aspect the better car, the SLR is just an ol' sluggish horse.
     
  19. SLR = penis with wheels.
     
  20. gtr 08 is more cos effective to get a true feel of performance
     
  21. @Dante: The GT-R's ring time is 7:29 and the SLR's 7:40 the Brabus would have had more torque which means more wheel spin which means loss of time around the twisties which means the GT-R is faster than the Brabus SLR.

    Though it may defeat it in 1/2 or 1/4 mile runs.
     
  22. You're not even making sense of the topic. Dude! You are an idiot!
     
  23. Uh Yes I know that, But we're talking strictly performance here. but ya u right.
     
  24. Let me be as clear as possible. "...simply because of the cost-effectiveness", dude we know that. Strictly perforance talk here. And why bring up the Veyron? It cearly states Brabus SLR McLaren Vs. Nissan GT-R. Stick to the topic...
     

Share This Page