Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Car Comparisons' started by astonghini, Dec 12, 2004.
F-50 is a complete waste... doesn't look half as good and doesnt go all that much better
You're a complete waste, so is this redundant poll.
F40, the F50 is as pointless as an F40 is. Not pointless at all.
F40, the F50 is f ugly
I like both.
Both kings !!
On the Greatest Cars of all time the F40 is on the top, the F50 is on the big flop list
You deserve to die for that comment.
but it's true
F40. I like both but there's just something i like more about the F40.
Is it me or is there *someone* here just obsessed with retarded polls?
the f50 is much nicer than the f40. teh f40 is a giant triangle with plastic looking rear lights.
I guess youve driven both.
The F40 is quicker in a straight line. Clarkson quoted something like 3.2! That is faster than an Enzo. It is only a 150 or so pounds heavier than an Elise. This is due to its lack of traction control, power steering and most modern computer aides. For a purer driving experience I will side with Clarkson. The F40 is better. The F50 is an awesome car (see Koenig's F50) but the lines aren't there. Why was it a convertible?
F50 for me......
Evo road tested the GTO v. F40 v. F50 v. Enzo, and the F50 won. It's obviously crap.
On a side note, I really can't believe that you havn't wisened up at all in the months you've been a member.
f50 is best ferrari ever made.. but.. f40 is second ..
That's a good question actually. Not that I don't like the thing that it's convertible...but why?
agreed, it's one of the best looking cars ever and it's a racecar for the street, no luxury at all
please scan! <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
i chose f40 btw, but f50 is not at all pointless
yeah ok but the f-50 is just about exactly teh same if not worse
my sentiments exactly...with 288GTO not far behind
nope can't agree f-40 best-> testarossa -> hmm then i dunno