How Ferrari spins (article/rant)

Discussion in 'European Cars' started by lucky strike, Feb 15, 2011.

  1. Also Chris Harris picked the 458 Italia over the McLaren in the same evo issue, that no-good biased British piece of cockpie.
  2. im a bit sad pronto hasnt come back after being banned
    sure stemmed the flow of stupid into this thread
  3. he was banned? lol
  5. "sometimes, and he doesn't blame them for tryng"... What!?!?' 4 months ago I wrote the same things, but I was called "fanboy"... now it's all ok :D
    if a supercar optimized its 0- 200 0.6s (ex 458 italia: Autocar 10.3, QR 9.7)... was an "Media Manipulation", but now is all OK .... :D
    perhaps because the MP4, after the first test, the 0-200 has pulled down more than a second? or maybe because I was not the only one to see t there are lots of tests about porsche Porsche, Lamborghini, etc. etc. have shown outstanding performances?
    this was a fake scoop, but some users have welcomed it as a new Crusade.
    The test of QR 458 (0-200 9.7s) was a Media Manipulation, but if a 997 Turbos is 9.8 (AZ) is "good form and weather."
    Furthermore, I cannot find any comments about the MP4 and the incredibly test from AZ or C&D, much more faster than tests from UK...
    0-200 1s faster than a "manipulated" 458 is...? good form, of course <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
  6. another 25 pages will start now....
  7. wait, what? that's him?
  8. RIP Pronto.
  10. #$%#ing lol if it is
  11. 25 pages? this (patetic) thread is dead, as like as the Crusade....
  12. yeah, he acts like a 15 year old spoiled kid.
  13. it is over from the 1st post, but u can not admit it.
  14. you're right: this thread is a 100% failure form the 1st post.
  15. what ever posted in the 1st post is true and there is no point of arguing too much about it.
  17. well the name and hometown matched…
  18. the true meaning of this discussion was: Ferrari (Ferrari... ONLY) manipulates the tests, all the mnfs other NOT.
    This theory is very badly wrecked, because just look at the many tests around the world (a small part of which I posted) to realize that it is not true. however you are free to believe what the want, for Ex. that other manufacturers choose at random from the assembly line (perhaps with a draw, like bingo?) the car to send for press ....
    But the best part of this story is when EVO (supercomparo 458 vs MP4 vs Noble) wrote "another victory for Maranello"... the funny word is not "victory", but "another" ... <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
    However, just after the comparo, Mc was immediately
    working to close the gap ... but NOT gap from Ferrari about the media manipulations, but about their car ... Why Mc works already on a MP4.2 if Ferrari wins just for manipulations?!?!??!?!? <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A> this is the most obvious (and funny) demonstrations that I'm right <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
    I repeat for the LAST time: Saints do not work in Ferrari, but if sometimes Ferrari sends for the press "ad hoc" units, the other manufacturers do exactly the same.
    the Crusade is over, and someone have lost the war.
  19. Ban
  20. Fact is Ferrari manipulates the tests, end of story.
  21. arguments are generally better when everyone speaks and understands the same language
  22. according with the two articles:
    Ferrari manipulates...
    other mnfs: optimize.... <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>

    even so... the McLaren is not agree with you <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
    end of the story
  23. I don't care about it.
    I've just say the truth, posting facts and data
  25. and is not a biased idiotic fanboy

Share This Page