M3 or this

Discussion in '2001 Mercedes-Benz C32 AMG' started by Emdec55, Aug 10, 2002.

  1. Re: M3 or this

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from almostthere</i>
    <b>I think i'd have to go with the M3. First, it produces 333 hp out of a inline 6 WITHOUT forced induction. Add a turbo or supercharger and you'll be well over 400 hp. Plus it is already faster stock vs. stock. I kind of liek the styling better of the mercedes, but the m3 is very close. I think I'd have to go with the m3...its also cheaper</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    i would say this because this is 354hp and that is 333hp
    and u added a turbo or a supercharger which made it 400hp
    if u add one of those turbo or supercharge to this it will still be higher than the m3<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">
     
  2. Re: M3 or this

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from aminy2002ca</i>
    <b><!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from almostthere</i>
    <b>I think i'd have to go with the M3. First, it produces 333 hp out of a inline 6 WITHOUT forced induction. Add a turbo or supercharger and you'll be well over 400 hp. Plus it is already faster stock vs. stock. I kind of liek the styling better of the mercedes, but the m3 is very close. I think I'd have to go with the m3...its also cheaper</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    i would say this because this is 354hp and that is 333hp
    and u added a turbo or a supercharger which made it 400hp
    if u add one of those turbo or supercharge to this it will still be higher than the m3<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"></b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Wow, so you're saying if you you modified the the C32 AMG to 400 horse power it would beat a stock M3! I can't believe it! Dumbass. Just another uneducated Mercedes fan.

    Angus<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: M3 or this

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from G1zm0</i>
    <b>ill repeat it oncce mmore.
    the C32 is a sedam, more practical, and more confortable. although not as fun, its still as fast.
    takes my vote !!</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    More practical eh? Comfortable? EXPLAIN. And its not as fast. At least you knew it wasn't as much fun because of the slushbox.

    Angus<!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: M3 or this

    i'm a really huge M3 fan, i have loved that car forever. both cars are almot even, the m3 had better styling, on the other hand, the c32 has better techincal statistcs and a better engine. the m3 is a beautiful car, but i hate to say this but the m3 has met it's match.... i would rather have the c32. in this case the mercedes name inches out the m3 this time
     
  5. Re: M3 or this

    What in hell makes you say that the C32 has a better engine? The fact that its not naturally aspirated? The M3 developes over 100hp to the litre out of a naturally aspirated engine, Mercedes never does that. The M3 is also way faster than this because it has a manual gearbox. There isn't a single car out there in the M3 class that stands a chance against the M3.

    Angus
     
  6. Re: M3 or this

    the C32 is as fast as the M3 get over it.
    now the CLK is a coupe, more luxurious, has more space then the M3 and has an 8 cylinder thus making it better...
     

Share This Page