Re: Kick M3s ahhs neday

Discussion in '2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK 55 AMG' started by branng, Aug 10, 2002.

  1. BR>Well, we can all tell that this guy needs a nice car in order to compinsate for his very small dick. Or maybe his problem is he is sexually attracted to cars. The fact of the matter is, that the M3 rapes this thing, in every way.

    Hey NYCSLiDer, you should try going on a date with a mercedes, they are sexy and all as you say, and it won't care that you have a noodle for a penis!

    Angus</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    OK, asshole, here are the facts:

    Fact: My family owns FOUR (yes, four) MB's. We have a CLK320 cabrio, an ML320, a C240 (these 3 are new), and an old 2000 ML320. Now, as for the having a "noodle for a penis", I went on vacation in Greece last year, and we brought the 2000 M-class down. I don't know if you or the other idiot making fun of me are aware of this, but at the time last year, the largest displacement you could have without paying a luxury tax was 2 Liters. this car had 3.2.

    Needless to say, you don't see many of them around in Greece. Exclusivity + good looks = women. I'm a fair looking man myself, with a 10 inch dick that I should use to mushroom stamp you #%$gots with, but instead I'll be using it to #$%# the women that step into the M class, just like last summer.

    So please, walk to the nearest corner, sit down, and jerk off, ok? thanks.

     
  2. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from NYCSLiDeR</i>
    <b>BR>Well, we can all tell that this guy needs a nice car in order to compinsate for his very small dick. Or maybe his problem is he is sexually attracted to cars. The fact of the matter is, that the M3 rapes this thing, in every way.

    Hey NYCSLiDer, you should try going on a date with a mercedes, they are sexy and all as you say, and it won't care that you have a noodle for a penis!

    Angus</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    OK, asshole, here are the facts:

    Fact: My family owns FOUR (yes, four) MB's. We have a CLK320 cabrio, an ML320, a C240 (these 3 are new), and an old 2000 ML320. Now, as for the having a "noodle for a penis", I went on vacation in Greece last year, and we brought the 2000 M-class down. I don't know if you or the other idiot making fun of me are aware of this, but at the time last year, the largest displacement you could have without paying a luxury tax was 2 Liters. this car had 3.2.

    Needless to say, you don't see many of them around in Greece. Exclusivity + good looks = women. I'm a fair looking man myself, with a 10 inch dick that I should use to mushroom stamp you #%$gots with, but instead I'll be using it to #$%# the women that step into the M class, just like last summer.

    So please, walk to the nearest corner, sit down, and jerk off, ok? thanks.

    </b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    WOW! VERY IMPRESSIVE! Your dad has money?! Thats great, maybe he can get some surgery for you and your small dick! So what you are saying about you going to Greece is the only reason that you got any women is because you had a rare car? Sweet! But you know what you should consider doing, is instead of buying a 80 000 dollar car, just go get a hooker for yourself! They really won't care that you have a noodle for a penis either.

    Cool, you drive around in an SUV! SPORTY!

    Angus<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. I am one of the biggest MB fans around.... But i do admit that the PRESENT CLK would lose to the M3.. MB will come around one day.. To all you fans that know whats coming up next with MB in the near future should be really happy..
    \/
    Peace out<!-- Signature -->
     
  4. lemme clear this up for all u mercades lovers.......... why the hell wud this kik bmw's ass if bmw had this on their first list of crap cars to compare it with the m3--- lemme show u

    BMW
    2002 M3
    coupe Mercedes-Benz
    2002 CLK-Class
    CLK55 AMG Coupe
    GENERAL

    Base Price MSRP $45,900 $68,450
    Engine Name 3.2L I6 5.5L V8

    Standard Transmission 6 Speed Manual 5 Speed Automatic

    Cylinders 6 8

    Displacement (cc) 3246 5439

    Displacement (ci) 198 332

    Horsepower @ RPM [email protected] [email protected]

    Torque @ RPM [email protected] [email protected]


    bmw s on the left, mercades clk on the right. well ya see? v6 beats a v8. gimme one mercades stock that cud do 155 mph in 4 sec like a bmw m3 hahahah shut ure mouth u dum #$%#s

    this is seriously sad for a v8<!-- Signature -->
     
  5. The CLK55AMG does 0-60 in 4.9 secs which makes it a tad slower than the M3, but the M3 can't match it in refinement, low speed torque and the deep rumble from the V8. BMW'S M3's inline 6 is a high revving buzzing sort of noise. BMW-Sport. Mercedes-Refinement/cruising in style.<!-- Signature -->
     
  6. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from NYCSLiDeR</i>
    <b>OK, you know what, all of you people that ride BMW's nuts are idiots. When you get right down to it, it's all about WHICH car will get you MORE FEMALE ASS. The new CLK is MUCH nicer than any piece of shit BMW out there, even if it has like, 75%, of it's BMW counterpart's ability. BMW's ARE UGLY (except the z8). Who really gives a shit about performance when you're in the backseat of a car #$%#ing your girlfriend's brains out? I mean, really? Any merc is sexier than a BMW, so HOLD THAT, YOU FAGGOTS.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    wtf? do you even know anything about cars? and how old are you? this is a thread comparing the MB CLK55 and the BMW M3 performance, value, and overall quality wise, not which car gets you laid which obviously you're desperate for. and what is with listing all of your cars, well great you're a spoiled little rich shit, no one cares. ok back to comparing the cars, and not from this site cause all they have is the manufacturers claims, and that is usually a little falsified. so lets go to good old Road & Track. R&T claims that the CLK55 AMG does 0-60 in 5.3 sec and the M3 in 4.7, M3 beats it there by quite a bit. they claim that the M3 does the quarter mile in 13.3 sec @ 106.8 mph and the CLK55 AMG at 13.7 sec @ 105.6 mph, so obviously the CLK55 cant touch the M3 in the 0-60 category, but it looks like it makes a good effort to catch up on the 1/4 mile but it still gets beat. If you wanna go into the issue of which car is classier, i would say the CLK55, so in the issue of which car has better performance, M3 all the way, but if you want a car with class and prestige, CLK55 AMG<!-- Signature -->
     
  7. lemme bring a little wisdom to this dumb thread.

    The CLK is more expensive, more luxurious, more pwerfull, more stylish. Its not as much of a track car as the M3 but is still as Fast on most/any roads. The CLK's official time to 60MPH is 5.2, but people have tested it to 4.9
    the M3's official time is 5.2 as well, has been tested at 4.8 if you want, who cares.

    in fact, the average driver won't be able to change gears as fast as a professional, the time to 60 will then be around 5.1 5.2 (this is why its an official time, because most people can make it go as fast as that)

    The CLK is more exclusive, and more of a status symbol. Its also brand new, with better design, confort, materails...etc


    The CLk definitly attracts more chicks. its an AMG benz <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">


    for the one that owns the ML, CLk...blahblah...
    i own a CLK320 Cabriolet !!if you do too, give me some details about the car,,,any pics ?? cause i do !!
    The people that brag about their dicks the most are usually the ones that got the smallest <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">
    4x4 drivers are really arrogant, they think they drive a big expensive car, when they actually don't !!
    the Bigger the car, the smaller the dick <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">
    hey ur cars beats everyone elses <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">..know what that means <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
     
  8. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from G1zm0</i>
    <b>lemme bring a little wisdom to this dumb thread.

    The CLK is more expensive, more luxurious, more pwerfull, more stylish. Its not as much of a track car as the M3 but is still as Fast on most/any roads. The CLK's official time to 60MPH is 5.2, but people have tested it to 4.9
    the M3's official time is 5.2 as well, has been tested at 4.8 if you want, who cares.

    in fact, the average driver won't be able to change gears as fast as a professional, the time to 60 will then be around 5.1 5.2 (this is why its an official time, because most people can make it go as fast as that)

    The CLK is more exclusive, and more of a status symbol. Its also brand new, with better design, confort, materails...etc


    The CLk definitly attracts more chicks. its an AMG benz <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">


    for the one that owns the ML, CLk...blahblah...
    i own a CLK320 Cabriolet !!if you do too, give me some details about the car,,,any pics ?? cause i do !!
    The people that brag about their dicks the most are usually the ones that got the smallest <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">
    4x4 drivers are really arrogant, they think they drive a big expensive car, when they actually don't !!
    the Bigger the car, the smaller the dick <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">
    hey ur cars beats everyone elses <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">..know what that means <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"></b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    well lets go through all the things you said... MB is more stylish, cant argue with that thats true. its more expensive, yeah but what the heck does the price have to do with how great the car is. yeah its more luxurious. you say its more powerful, well it is a V-8 this site says it has 367 hp and all the car magazines ive looked through says 342 so who knows, the M3 has 343 bhp. you talk about the speeds, road and track isnt gonna falsify information like the manufacturers, and they get 0-60 on M3 at 4.7 and CLK55 AMG at 5.3 so i would say, performace wise, the M3 beats the CLK, but the CLK is definitely more exclusive, more sought after, and more comfortable than the M3<!-- Signature -->
     
  9. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from G1zm0</i>
    <b>lemme bring a little wisdom to this dumb thread.

    The CLK is more expensive, more luxurious, more pwerfull, more stylish. Its not as much of a track car as the M3 but is still as Fast on most/any roads. The CLK's official time to 60MPH is 5.2, but people have tested it to 4.9
    the M3's official time is 5.2 as well, has been tested at 4.8 if you want, who cares.

    in fact, the average driver won't be able to change gears as fast as a professional, the time to 60 will then be around 5.1 5.2 (this is why its an official time, because most people can make it go as fast as that)

    The CLK is more exclusive, and more of a status symbol. Its also brand new, with better design, confort, materails...etc


    The CLk definitly attracts more chicks. its an AMG benz <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">


    for the one that owns the ML, CLk...blahblah...
    i own a CLK320 Cabriolet !!if you do too, give me some details about the car,,,any pics ?? cause i do !!
    The people that brag about their dicks the most are usually the ones that got the smallest <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">
    4x4 drivers are really arrogant, they think they drive a big expensive car, when they actually don't !!
    the Bigger the car, the smaller the dick <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">
    hey ur cars beats everyone elses <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">..know what that means <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"></b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    I'm proud of you Gizmo, you kept your stupidity to a minimum. I've seen the M3's time 0-60 as low as 4.625. The fact that you need a CLK to get chicks seems right in character with you! The time it takes to shift gears isn't as crucial as the time in which you would like to switch gears. Status symbols, design, and exclusiveness is all in perspective.

    Angus<!-- Signature -->
     
  10. okay guys listen up,
    you all know as well as i do 0/60s are fun but not crucial. in automatics or manumatics whatever, you can get almost a half second of variation just by holding the brake or not. now we all definitly know any run with a manual can easily differ by a half second. so granted their within a half car of eachother at worst. the 0 to 100, is where your power gets to really shine and it is the M3 which wins at 11.5 seconds in road and track, i believe the CLK is in the 12s but not exactly where. i havent driven the M3 but i have driven the CLK55 and its great but has some serious oversteer, off line traction issues. i have driven a 330ci and its much happier to change direction and brake compared with the CLK55. on the luxury front the CLK55 wins horribly, it is quite pimp. the M3 at least to me looks like it has its ass in the air from the back. however it is still a good looking car but not a beautiful looking car. personally iam bout it ill take the M3 so i can visit all my girls and still afford to take them to lunch. bmw fans iam with you on this one, but next year there will be a 500hp clk amg i think that will #$%# our faithful m3 out of existance.
     

Share This Page