Re: Name a car you would rather have!!

Discussion in '2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S' started by Torn18Si, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL Yellow LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO IN PEARL YELLOW
     
  2. HOLY CRAP OVER 15,000 POSTS!!!!!!! Get off the computer!!!!!!
     
  3. Darrian T90 gtr fitted with 6.2ltr rover v8.
     
  4. Isn't TVR Speed 12 a car in this league?
     
  5. ferrari f50 gt
     
  6. the one car i would have rather then this one gots to be:

    Mercedez Benz CLK-GTR, not lambo, mclaren or aston marin.

    all CLK-GTR's rule!!! 4sho, holla.
     
  7. 1957 Ferrari 250 Testa Rossa
     
  8. Thrust SSC and Spirit of America....lol
     
  9. There definitely is no stock Porsche right now that can rival this, thats true. And I think though the Carrera GT will be insane cool and fast and beautiful, it probably still won't rival this. Also, there is a little known factory engine option for the Porsche 911 Turbo that bring the horsepower to 450bhp, but not 500.(See October Issue of European Car)

    Anyway, I would take no car in the world over this, it's number 1, and will remain so for quite a while, probably.
     
  10. shows how little you know, do more research...
    cant find it anywhere? well, im not telling you where
     
  11. Dauer 962, Mercedes CLK-GTR, McLaren F1, Koenig 962, TVR Speed 12, Bugatti 16/7 Veyron, F-50, Henassey Viper, stuff like that. All of those cars are way nicer than this thing!!!!!1
     
  12. Jaguar e-type 1963 <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
     
  13. why would anyone take a murcielago, (not macielago or murcialago,) aver this, it's less expensive, less powerful, less exotic, less fast, and doesn't have as good handling
    The only car I'd take over this would be a Bugatti 16/4 Veyron, and possibly a Carrera gt, but only 'cause I'm biased toward it
     
  14. Pagani Zonda C12S 7.3 fo shizzle
     
  15. i would take, any restored "bath-tub" porsche (other wise known as the 356) or a carrera GT, or a Sportec tuned 911 (as in my sig.)

    but hey, after those, this car is really nice.
     
  16. McLaren F1 LM, Ferrari F50 GT, Ferrari Enzo or the Bat Mobile <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/tongue.gif"></A>
    But this is still an awesome car.
     
  17. Very nice car, looks alot like the modena though<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/sad.gif"></A> probably bugatti, or Lambo millenium..still, good performance and ratios.
     
  18. i would rather have an Enzo, or a dauer 962 LM
     

  19. Re:
    Name a car you would rather have!!


    GT1 Escudo Pikes Peak Version Pagani Zonda C12S 7.3 and Ferrari Enzo
     
  20. Viper Hennessey 800tt...mayb 1000tt 2..lol
     
  21. So, you're a big Viper fan, huh?
    Just a tip: don't get carried away with liking the Viper so much
    that you might think it's the best car ever, like freaks out there
    have tried to proove, which they failed.
    Just trying to help you out so that you dont become one of those people. Not saying there's anything wrong with people liking Vipers(b/c everyone is entitled to their own preference), just saying that people let their opinion get the best of them.
    Stay cool buddy.
     
  22. you mean it would come second in performance then you're wrong as with most Hennessey fans. I'm not saying there not god cars, there just no where near as good as similarly specced production cars if for anything cos of the fact that they are modified and the production car is'nt.
     
  23. hey retard
    have you ever heard off a SVS Stryker TT Stage III? its got over 1100 hp and its got about 950lbs torque and its peak torque is at a very low rpm so what the hell are you talking about. but anywayz the CC looks hella tite!oh yeah and SVS is making the Stryker TT RS upgrade, it'll give the viper 1700hp!!!!!AMERICAN MUSCLE ALL THE WAY, except for really exotic european cars, LOL
     
  24. Could you even control 1700Bhp on a road. This would beat a SVS Stage III on a track cos it's much better balanced for cornering. I don't know the SVS'S straight line speed so I wont comment but this can keep up with and on some tracks beat a Zonda C12S which was'nt far behind the Enzo when top gear compared them.
    Anyway the SVS is an aftermarket Viper. Anyone can have a car tuned to go this quick with money but it takes a skill to desighn and build one for production. Especially to take on the F1.
     
  25. If I could afford this car I wouldn't have to choose anything over it.
     

Share This Page