Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'European Cars' started by GrimBeaver, Dec 23, 2004.
why? it's a good post
Yeah, but why compare 3 Mercedes'?
why not? you see the SL55 isn't much faster than a SL600 and the SL55 isn't that much more impressive than an SL65...
Yes, but what does this prove?
it doesn't have to prove anything. it's just interesting.
it proves one of them is useless <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
On a slightly different note, asides from wheels and badge, is there any way of telling a SL600 from the exterior?
it's a good comparo
i'd have loved to see the slr in here as well
as far as I know there isn't
Ditch the SLR, I'd take an sl65 and the cash anyday
none of them are uselss..
Bah, gimme the SL65. It may be a beast, but I'll get the biggest kicks out of it.
I suppose I can handle that, just this once. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
SL55 - The best "value" of money.
SL600 - The most refined
SL65 - The most pointless (who cares if you had enough money.)
738 ft lbs for me....switch the badging with SL500 badging and watch people be like wtf
To many SL cars.
well they perform alike and look alike...
Campared to the SL500? It has quad exhaust tips like the AMG cars, as opposed to the dual tips on the SL500.
SL 65 AMG is better faster and more beautiful but it is strange to compare 3 SLs.
The acceleration of the SL65 is $#&%ing crazy!!! But put a corner in the equation, and it probably can't handle worth jack-shit....
The 65 is insane, and I love it