Lowered Vehicles Tend to Have Airbag Suspension. Which allows them to be extrememly low, or at normal ride height. Now all you idiots can stop talking about "bottoming out on a piece of paper."
I would also still go with the CTS V, and if I needed I would send it to Mallett for some adjustments. http://www.mallettcars.com/events/2004_CD_shootout/CTS-V-final_run.mov supercharged 427 690BHP.
Id taker the caddy. Damn SHO was modded anyway. But you gotta hand it to him. But yea the caddy is still much much better.
modified? NOO WAYY!!! anyways, this thread wasnt meant to be a comparison, the vs. was for the video, not like actually asking.
When Gerbel just posted the video for interest's sakes. Obviously, no one is going to take a 15 year old car over a new V8 sport sedan. It's just neat to see how fast the modified SHO is.
the point when i posted "taurus SHO vs CTSv" in the title, meaning exactly what it says, that the video is a "taurus SHO vs CTSv" im sure everyone in here would take a brand new RWD V8 6 speed sedan vs a 15 year old fwd v6 priced less than half as much when it was new.