Typo. Has to be.

Discussion in '2002 Bentley State Limousine' started by DANVM, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Are they sure this is a 2002?! Looks more like a 50's.<!-- Signature -->
     
  2. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    Your signature is insanely huge. Do you really think that's what people want to see over and over again? Probably not.<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    it is long don't you think you should cut it down some<!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    Getting back to the topic.. I thought it was a typo at first to.. but there are a few companies making cars now that look old. I dont like it very much either way, I'm usually more into performance cars than cars that scream "I have a lot of money!" just because of the logo on the front.<!-- Signature -->
     
  5. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    My signature catches attention.<!-- Signature -->
     
  6. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from BugattiFan</i>
    <b>Getting back to the topic.. I thought it was a typo at first to.. but there are a few companies making cars now that look old. I dont like it very much either way, I'm usually more into performance cars than cars that scream "I have a lot of money!" just because of the logo on the front.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    It's not only the prestigous name tag, it's also the fact that this car is one of the most comfortable, luxurious, and longest lasting cars out there. This car is built with such quality, that it lasts 15-20 years without a MAJOR tuneup.<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
     
  7. Re: Typo. Has to be.


    It's not only the prestigous name tag, it's also the fact that this car is one of the most comfortable, luxurious, and longest lasting cars out there. This car is built with such quality, that it lasts 15-20 years without a MAJOR tuneup.



    Yea so did my dads old Pontiac Sunbird. and that still runs like its right off the lot great.. doesn't look so good though...and it doesn't realy "stun" like a bentley would... <!-- Signature -->
     
  8. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    Actually, this car looks much more modern than the older cars in the Royal Fleet (notice the headlights). Attached below is another royal motorcar for comparison, although this one happens to be a Rolls Royce. They all share the type of overly high windows, primarily I believe so that people can see the royalty inside. Too bad (maybe) for most people, unless your in the British royal family, you'll never ride one of these, as they are exclusively designed for the family.
     
  9. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    My sig gets attention!<!-- Signature -->
     
  10. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    No typo.<!-- Signature -->
     
  11. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    No its new. They just sorta kept the style they always had. Royals-Royce is the same way, their cars don't look like they have changed in 50 years.

    Spyder757
     
  12. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    All Bentleys look the same. Did anyone see the weight!! Almost 4 tons!! Good thing it has a crapload of torque.
     
  13. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    no
    most cars in the royal fleet are old
    and they didn't want it to look different
    and it doesn't need a lot of torque, it is going to go around in parades at 5-10 mph in 1st fo most of its life<!-- Signature -->
     
  14. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    I said it has alot of torque. 616 ft. lb. is a whole bunch of torque....and quite impressive. Torque is good when you're just tooling around at parades at 5 and 10 miles per hour and all of sudden some idiot starts shooting at you and you have to get up and go.
     
  15. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    i dunno i like the old style for bentleys. i cringe at the thought of a modernized bentley or not so much cringe as think it as something other than a bentley...for example that hunandieres one.
     
  16. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    It's modeled on another car that one of the royals had once. I got one word- FUGLY<!-- Signature -->
     
  17. Re: Typo. Has to be.

    I like it but of course there is no way in hell il ever drive in one but thats ok.<!-- Signature -->
     

Share This Page