Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

Discussion in '1959 Chevrolet Corvette' started by z28infront, Aug 10, 2002.

  1. The ford Lightning is like a supercar only a truck. The GMC Cyclone was a supercar that looked like a truck. What is this Dodge? Only a little truck that looks OK. 0-60 mph 8.0 seconds is no supercar or supertruck!!!
     
  2. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    It does look like a RC car.
     
  3. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    Wow did someone steal the design plans for the Ford Tonka and spill cofee on it? Sure looks like it. Another pinnacle of crap from dodge.<!-- Signature -->
     
  4. #4 tqaguy, Aug 10, 2002
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    I don't understand. SuperCars.net shows this prototype - which may or may not ever see production - but doesn't say one thing about the Dodge RAM SRT-10 ( http://www.car-truck.com/chryed/buzz/b011002.htm), which *is* going into production. I mean, it only has the next-gen Viper V10 and 6-speed tranny, does 0-60 in 5 sec and the 1/4 mile in 13. And it can haul your boat while doing it!
     
  5. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    Yes! Why?
     
  6. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    I agree... Not a super car but it is pretty nice...<!-- Signature -->
     
  7. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    ITS A CONCEPT. WHO CARES. And how the heck can you say this like the Tonka? Did you notice the Tonka is about 3 times the size and is a Heavy Duty truck. This Dodge is made to be a little generic pickup that has a little bit more agile look. Come on you guys, you gotta pick up on this stuff. I mean its like comparing Vipers and Miatas. It just isn't right to compare the too. They're different classes.
     
  8. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    It's definately not a usual Dodge design, but it is quite stylish. Dodge is known for being different, however I would much rather they stick with building the powerhouse trucks that I'm used to seing.
     
  9. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    My last reply wasn't harsh enough. This thing is embarassing. It's a pathetic attempt at building a "cool" truck. If I see another one of these I'm going to resort to Fords or Chevys.
     
  10. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    My last reply wasn't harsh enough. This thing is embarassing. It's a pathetic attempt at building a "cool" truck. If I see another one of these I'm going to resort to Fords or Chevys.

    Jimmyjo
     
  11. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    actually, if you would look around just a little bit you would find that supercars.net does have a page on the srt 10, which, i will agree, is an awesome, awesome truck.
     
  12. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    actually, if you would look around just a little bit you would find that supercars.net does have a page on the srt 10, which, i will agree, is an awesome, awesome truck.
     
  13. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    Sorry... I think they called it an M-80, 'cause that's what I wanna stick into this thing's gas tank.

    Why are all the new cars ugly?! WHHYYY?!?!?!?!
     
  14. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    yeah that new dodge is going to be the BOMB, but they could've put a 528 hemi, cuz it puts out more power than the viper V10
     
  15. Re: Well it is no supercar, I like it for a small truck.

    Looks like a Remote Control Car lol. The power of one too <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A> . And that was a joke because some of you will get offended.
     
  16.  
  17.  

Share This Page