Jay leno doesn't have a fav car but he does have a favourite car company... what is your fav supercar company? <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
Voted Mercedes because they make more models I like than any other company, even if most of them aren't 'supercars'
The one that makes cool cars <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
Detomaso can't vote <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
m1, m3, m5, m6. not your defninition of supercar maybe but in most peoples eyes they are above the average.
the M1 is a supercar. an argument could be made for the 507 and the 3.0 CSL being supercars as well but thats about it.
The 850 has the same engine as the mclaren f1 i believe but only had like 370hp this is definately a supercar imo
maybe i'm reading it wrong Originally envisioned as a Ferrari competitor equipped with a special 550 bhp (410 kW; 558 PS) version of the S70 engine, essentially a bored out version of the M70 with experimental multi-valve cylinder heads. A common misconception is that this engine powered the McLaren F1. However, when this was suggested to McLaren's designer Gordon Murray, the idea was rejected because the engine was too heavy and long for the McLaren F1. Rather, variations on the original S70 used on the 850csi, the S70/2 and S70/3 were used for the McLaren F1 (The variation used on the M8 prototype was the S70/1 engine).
the 850 CSI never had the same engine as the McLaren F1. a couple test cars were made with that engine (might have been done as an M8, which would have been a supercar) but it was deemed too expensive to make so they didnt' do it. also the Nazca isn't a BMW its an Italdesign with a BMW engine.