WHAT THE ****???

Discussion in '2002 Lamborghini Murciélago' started by elputus2k2, Aug 10, 2002.

  1. Re: WHAT THE ****???

    koo<!-- Signature -->
  2. Who the hell do the people in Lamborghini think they are?
    First of all, let's get one thing straight, no matter how hard Lamborghini tries, their cars will never compete with Koeing modified Ferrari's. I don't care if they're modified or not...
    Ferrari is better.
  3. Re: WHAT THE ****???

    whats your point ya MORON! Swearin isn't gonna make you very popular
    - not to mention INTELLIGENT. So lose the potty-mouth junior, and go
    play nintendo or something.<!-- Signature -->
  4. Re: WHAT THE ****???

    i disagree, u ever heard of the Gemballa Letec Diablo, 950bhp and a top speed of 260mph, wheres ur ferrari at now biatch, quad turbo and a skidpad handling of 1.15gs, 0-60 in 3 flat, not bad, lol<!-- Signature -->
  5. Re: WHAT THE ****???

    First of all, JAGFUCK, i think ur the one with mental conditions and a brain abnormality and second of all snyper, the Lamborghini that you mentioned is jacked to the max. Wait for the F60 u #$%# and we'll see what KOENIG does to that. It'll leave the lamborghini and you looking like shit.

    PS. sniper, Ferrari F50 has less horsepower and a better quarter mile and 0-60 than ur crap car.
  6. Re: WHAT THE ****???

    hey 550koenig there is no point in being rude, i understand the passion for ur f50, it is a beautiful car, that i will admit to, but u r wrong in several points, the direct competitor to the f50 is the Diablo GT, as the GT was a replacement to the SV, not a road going race homoglotian special, that is the Diablo GTR, anyway enough with that lets just look at the times:
    Diablo GT:
    1/4 mile time...11.6secs

    1/4 mile time...12.1secs

    so as u can see there is a difference and it is in favour of the diablo, so in my opinion u r wrong, and handling, the diablo is 1.05gs, and the f50's is 1.03gs, i think the info speaks volumes for the diablos case<!-- Signature -->
  7. Re: WHAT THE ****???

    The '99 Diablo SV has a better 1/4 mile time than the F50, and that is even though the F50 has better grip at the start!

    Ferrari F50:
    0-60 mph: 3.7 seconds
    1/4 mile: 12.1-11.9 seconds

    '99 Diablo SV:
    0-60 mph: 4.0 seconds
    1/4 mile: 12.0 -11.9 seconds

    0-60 mph 3.6 seconds
    1/4 mile 11.4-11.6 seconds (estimated)

    And when they make the lightened RWD version of the Murcielago you just wait and see.
  8. Re: WHAT THE ****???

    Shut the #$%# up Elputus, what kind of gayass name is that?
  9. Re: WHAT THE ****???

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from 550Koenig</i>
    <b>Shut the #$%# up Elputus, what kind of gayass name is that?</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->
    ... Why don't you just type in the F word in instead of #$%#?
    Cuz you already type it in the Subject...<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">

    But I like Lamborghini more than Ferrari, I like Lamborghini more if I want a car with feel of a pure race car, but I like Ferrari for normal daily driving, because it's easier to handle, but I just like Lamborghini more.
    At least looked much sharper than the Ferraris....<!-- Signature -->

Share This Page