Re: THIS CAR SUX

Discussion in '1995 Ferrari F50' started by 94stang5L, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. The Mods should ban these rude newbies.<!-- Signature -->
     
  2. FERRARI FAG!!!!!!! OF COURSE THEY WONT BE ABLE TO AFFORD ONE. SO HOWS YOUR FRIEND IN FLORIDA WITH ONE....OH WAIT HE DONT HAVE ONE FAG. HE CANT EVEN AFFORD ONE EITHER. BECAUSE THEY ARE 500,000 DUMBASS. I STILL WILL TAKE A VIPER VENOM OVER A GAY FERRARI BECAUSE OF THE PRICE!


    fERRARI FAG IS A FAG FOR ALL OF U THAT ARE FAGS.....I WOULD TRY TO HOOK IT UP WITH FERRARIBOY!
     
  3. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from the master</i>
    <b>Everybody will understand what i said when the f60 will come.
    It will be the ugliest car in this world!!
    i'll better buy a fiat punto,it had a better look and it's less expensive.
    To answer the very "CLEVER" Oliver Peckyyy who own every car on this site (because he's intelligence permit him to earn much money),of course the F50 out perform 90% of all the cars in the world but for 500,000 dollars,f50 should beat 99% of all cars in this world, but with only 325km/h top speed it can't.If you compare the f50 with the F40(The enzo final car),you will ask you where is the fluidity,the racing looks,the light,the driving sensation etc... that have the F40
    ????The f50 is 40hp more than a f40 but it's 250kg heavier.The f50 conceptor wanted a car derivated of a F1,that why they used very expensive materials but the car still heavy because it's too big.There is many cars less expansive with equal or better performance like the F40,Jaguar XJ220,Bugatti EB110,porsche Ruf CTR2...
    I think if the commandator was still here,He never let brought this Fer...euh FIAT F50 with all it negatives aspects.If you are so clever and objective you should now this without i had to tell you and if you are a "tifosi" I can't do anything for you because every car in red with a horse will be the BEST,the MOST BEAUTIFULL,the most.... car in the world for you.I'm not anti-Ferrari but I don't like the ferrari since 1991.If you take a look to f550 maranello or the 456 and you compare them to the "testarrossa" or 288GTO you will understand what the ferrari's was: fantastic sensationnal and exclusive dreaming car but if you want a car to go to work every mourning with a "linear" sensation,take a 456 or a 550,i'll let you.
    The 360 modena is the best ferrari you can buy nowday but the porsche turbo had better performance and it more easy to use every day!
    That why i think that ALL ferrari since 1990 SUCKS!!
    Ferrari's director now that whatever the performance the look or the model,they will sell easylly all their car because Ferrari owner buy ferrai just for the name "FERRARI",this prestigious and glorious firm that won many race with a so carismatic COMMANDATORE.

    To finish this (too?)long answer Oliver,you don't know anything about me that why i don't why you insult me.And for my username,Mr intellectual,you will understand why i call me like that.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    YOU say that the Jaguar is a lot less expensive than the Ferrari, then think again. The Jaguar Xj220 costs $678,000 dollars. Now let me see, how is 678K a lot less than 500K. I really don't understand your logic. You also say that the Bugatti EB110 is a lot cheaper than the F50, think again. The Bugatti costs $486,000. I feel that when you are up in the 500, 000 dollar range, 14K doesn't matter.
    I also don't understand why you are so concerned with the top speed. You must be crazy to concider 202 mph to be slow. By the way, Ferrari isn't concerned about top speed, they even say so when in production of the new f60. They care more about getting from 0-100 mph in 6 seconds, "master."
     
  4. well Ivan..umm..i dont know why u r so mad. i am just saying that that is a nice supra. i'd rather have the F40 anyday. the F40 is my ultimate dream car. u need to just calm ur dumbass down anyways..of course i cant buy a ferrari, i'm 18 dumbass. u need to get a life and not get so upset over someone saying a veilside supra is nice, cause fact is, it is a nice supra. i dont know where u get off sayin all that shit to em anyways. callin me a beggar on the street...so what kinda car do u drive ivan? what kind of car do u REALLY drive? honestly? i drive a '96 Prelude Si. nice car but doesnt compare with anything we're talkin about in these forums.
     
  5. I'm NOT AGREE with you carman,the bugatti eb 110 gt and the xj220 both cost approximaly 350000 dollars!!!THEN THINK AGAIN AGAIN AND AGAIN BEFORE SAYING THINGS LIKE THAT!!!
    150000 dollars less than the f50!!!!!
    150000 DOES IT MATTER????With these money,you can buy a modena or a porsche turbo!!!
    The top speed of a car doen't really matter because the owner of all this cars can't push them at the top speed,but what is matter is the time you will take to reach this top speed(the acceleration).NORMALLY and USUALLY (but i know,not always!),the top speed of a car is proportionnal of the acceleration: a car with a bad homogeneity of these two thing have no interest for me.With a f50 when you go at 200mph you are on the limit of the car,you can't accelerate more and I think is a very dangerous driving!But if you took a Mclaren F1,at 200mph,you are not on the final gear!!!I think,it's evident,with a Mclaren F1 you will be more in safety at 200mph(if you find a road to reach it!!!).The mclaren F1 is one of the best car in the world because of it's homogeneity,it can reach 240mph but with a 0-60mph in 3.1sec,one second faster than the f50 who took 0-60mph in 4.1sec and not 3.7sec like we can see on these site.But it's a very expensive car,(double of the f50)I know! but it was just for an exemple.
    When you say that just matter the acceleration,i'm not agree with you,i think both acceleration and top speed matter in a supercar and if you want just a car with a great acceleration,you better buy a dragster or a supra with a NOS kit or anything else!!(Are you a Fast and Furious fan??).
     
  6. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from McLaren_Man</i>
    <b>This car does not suck... Its very class!</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --><!-- Signature -->
     
  7. well, "Master" i've read through you're statements, which you have attempted to bullshit into validity......{note that half the words he used are not actually words...ie: "derivated"?!?!?!? derived maybe?} If you are going to make seat-of-your-pants statements, please take the time to think about your statements.....

    Stylistically, the F50 is different from all other past ferrari's in specifics, but the essence remains historic. You cannot even begin to make complaints on the drivability of the F50 since you have obviously never driven it, let alone the F40 to which you so elequently compared it to.....{I'm not using too many big words am I? Please let me know if you'd like a translation to ignorant baby}

    And all of us ferrari lovers will just have to forgive the other 10% of the vehicles produced througout the world for outperforming the car in question.

    In the futur please consider the repercussions of any lame-ass remark you have about a vehicle you will never come close to in design, driving, manufacturing.....I would hate to see the results of your attempts.well, "Master" i've read through you're statements, which you have attempted to bullshit into validity...... If you are going to make seat-of-your-pants statements, please take the time to think about your statements.....

    Stylistically, the F50 is different from all other past ferrari's in specifics, but the essence remains historic. You cannot even begin to make complaints on the drivability of the F50 since you have obviously never driven it, let alone the F40 to which you so elequently compared it to.....

    And all of us ferrari lovers will just have to forgive the other 10% of the vehicles produced througout the world for outperforming the car in question.

    In the futur please consider the repercussions of any lame-ass remark you have about a vehicle you will never come close to in design, driving, manufacturing.....I would hate to see the results of your attempts.
     
  8. Al of u people out there who say dat the F50 or anyother Ferrari sux ,can go #$%# a duck or somefin.

    Am i rite Ferrari lovers??????????<!-- Signature -->
     
  9. Hello Torn18Si, I'm now driving a 911 996 Turbo.
     
  10. to put it bluntly ivan, you're a lair...no one that is so stupid as u would have a 911 turbo. if u did, u wouldnt waste ur time here, and u sure as hell would be alot more refined in your arguments. i dont think anyone else here could possibly believe u that u have a 911 Turbo. honestly, just tell the truth and be a man..it's not like u need to impress anyone here anyways, it's a friggin forum for christ sake.
     
  11. It appears that many people in this forum like to bash Ferraris. It's just too bad that none of them can come up with a single valid argument as to why Ferraris suck.

    Some of you have mentioned that porsches and mclarens and even vipers are better. All i have to say is this... If porsche is so great, I want to see them make a single good road car that does not have a turbocharger. If they did, then everyone would see how pitiful its performance really is. And furthermore, let's see porsche enter Formula 1... Let's see how well they do with some "real" competition.

    And all you mclaren-lovers think that your company is so great. All I have to say is "look at the standing in F1. Team Ferrari won the constructor's title for the past 3 years. So F*ck you all."

    And whoever said that the viper is good is overlooking the fact that it has an 8-liter engine. Case closed.

    Those of you who say that Ferrari's are overpriced do not understand economics. Let me give you a quick lesson. When companies make cars, there are variable costs and fixed costs. The more cars you make, the lower the fixed costs per car. If Ferraris cost more, it is partly because the company can only spread its fixed costs over a smaller # of cars.

    If any Ferrari haters want to act like 5 year olds and insult my intelligence, I will let you all know right now that I have a 4.0 gpa at an IvyLeague school. (Wharton/UPENN)

    Ferrari Forever



     
  12. hey "schumacher28" thanx for standin up man.
    cauz these people were just insultin the Ferrari to much.

    Ferrari rulz.<!-- Signature -->
     
  13. I dun have to cheat you, man. I have 2 daily cars in my garage, one 996 Turbo (silver) and a BMW 320Ci. I've time to fu@k around here coz I dun have to work everyday like you jerk. Stay with your Hyundai with your intelligence.
     
  14. hahaha...ivan is a liar and he knows it. who honestly that could afford those cars would sit here and insult people on the internet..and btw it's honda not hyundai. HUGE difference. no offense ivan..well wait..yes do take offence. but i dont believe u, and probably no one else does.
     
  15. Porsches may be more reliable than Ferraris, the McLaren may beat any road Ferrari on the track, and the Viper may be a way better value on the drag strip. But Porsche has hardly changed the look of its cars during almost all their years of existance. Also, the most expensive road Ferrari costs half the amount of the McLaren, so they are kind of in a different class. And also, a Viper cannot be compared to a Ferrari because it has no heritage and it is first and formost a drag racer.

    I would also like to reiterate what Oliver Peck said. That people own Ferraris not because they are ncessarily the fastest and best mechanically. But because of something inexplicable having to do with both their amazing beauty and great heritage.

    One thing that I, as a Ferrari fan, am ashamed of, is the look of the new F60, or at least its look according to Car and Driver. That thing is completely shaped by the wind tunnel, not by an artist. That pisses me off. What are the people at Ferrari thinking? Has performance conquered beauty? <!-- Signature -->
     
  16. it does has 'only' 520 hp but it comes out from 4,7 L engine, it's a great car compare to stupid viper 450hp from 8 L truck engine.
     
  17. I would also like to reiterate what Oliver Peck said. That people own Ferraris not because they are ncessarily the fastest and best mechanically. But because of something inexplicable having to do with both their amazing beauty and great heritage.


    the above quote is so true.<!-- Signature -->
     
  18. i completely agree.
     
  19. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Renegade</i>
    <b>I would also like to reiterate what Oliver Peck said. That people own Ferraris not because they are ncessarily the fastest and best mechanically. But because of something inexplicable having to do with both their amazing beauty and great heritage.


    the above quote is so true.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->
    100% damn right!
     
  20. why r Ferrai so good at producin such good supercars???????lol<IMG SRC="http://www.supercarforums.com/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
     
  21. Aight everybody, let's all just discuss this in a calm way. Aight wat the hell are you all thinking are you #$%#ing dum. are you gay or what. Ferrari is one of the most respected companies in this world and it wouldn't come out with a piece of shit car. let's see put any of your #$%#ing gay piece of shit cars up to mine and it will wipe them out, with the acception of the jaguar xj220 and the mclaren f1. other than those everybody get ready to kiss f50's ass, cuz that's all your gonna see racing against my baby!! ooooooooo wat do you people have to say now huh!!! ooo wat!! ferrari,lambourghini wat ooo you dont know shit about cars aight so shut your #$%#ing mouths bitches!
     
  22. Schumacher you are a piece of sh...!!!
    You want to see Porsche "make a single good road car that does not have a turbocharger"?? Look at the Carrera GT!!!!!
    Pitiful performance?? It beat the f50!!
    You want see porsche enter F1??? Don't you remenber the years 1984,1985,1986, the mclaren TAG Porsche won all this years the F1 championship with a REAL F1 : +1000 hp turbo engine!!!!!!!!
    So why Porsche don't re-enter F1? I don't know,maybe F1 nowdays is just a money game,if you have money you will win but if not.....
    So mickael,don't say stupid things like my 8 years old sister!!!!!
    I don't know why you compare mclaren F1 team and mclaren cars,it's 2 different things!! Did you compare the scuderia ferrari with ferrari road car departement???If Ferrari is so great in F1,why they don't built an ultimate road car like the mclaren F1????Maybe because they can't built a car with performance like this!!!(too stupid (like you??))
    "Ferrari won the constructor's title for the past 3 years".AHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!Look at how many time mclaren win the f1 championship and CRY!!
    And to finish, mister "4.0 gpa at an IvyLeague school" look at the lamborghini murceliago,it beat all the ferrari(and the f50 of course)with a price 2 time less expensive!!!."Case closed"

    So,Shumiiii do your homework and let speak all the "clever" persons in this forum!!!
     
  23. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from nipman007</i>
    <b>THIS IS THE WORST FERRARI EVER MADE. IT IS SOOOOOOO UGLY. DAMN THE PT CRUISER LOOKS BETTER THAN THIS $#!%. aND ITS ONLY HAS 520HP. iF I PAY $500,000 FOR A CAR, i EXPECT A HUGE TWIN TURBO V12 WITH 900HP.

    RIPOFF? I THINK SO</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Common it's not a piece of shit.

    It still beats the shit out of many cars that were made after.
     
  24. You not liking this car has nothing to do with how good or bad it is. First off Its naturaly aspired which = instant throtel response. This car has about 100 bhp per liter, very respectable 0-60 and 100 times, and a top speed of over 200mph. Sure there are cars that go faster but on most real tracks (ones with speed checks) there is no need for this you will never go that fast. Its quarter mile is slightly lacking compared with other cars of its price and for what it is, it is on the expensiv side but then the 962 schaupen is much more over priced. Its styling is in my opinion not bad but that is just an opinion. Weather you like it or not it is not a bad car.
     
  25. This is in response to the post by "the master".

    If you want to discuss anything with me, do me a favor... discuss it like a man and don't resort to childish name calling to make yourself sound so tough and almighty.

    The porsche carrera gt... yeah, it's a fast car. I will give you that. But I don't think it's so superior to the F50. In a worst case scenario, even if it could beat the F50, why would it matter? You are comparing a car designed in the late 90's/early 2000's to one that was designed in the early 90's. Of course the technology of road cars has increased dramatically since then, so it's not really a big accomplishment for porsche to beat a car designed years beforehand.

    And when I said that Porsche doesn't make good road cars without turbo's, I was NOT referring to limited edition GT versions. I am referring to the cars which comprise over 95% of their sales figures. In that respect, I think I am justified to say that the road porsche's do not compare to the road Ferraris like the 360 modena and 550 maranello.

    And about Formula 1... yeah, porsche did have success with mclaren in the mid 80's, but only as an engine manufacturer. I honestly don't believe that porsche could do what ferrari does and that is design a chassis AND an engine at the same time. Ferrari is the only team who does that now... Mclaren doesn't, Williams doesn't, etc. (Toyota will in 2002, but that's besides the point because they won't be good for a while).

    You wrote, "So why Porsche don't re-enter F1? I don't know,maybe F1 nowdays is just a money game,if you have money you will win but if not....."
    Let's think about this for a second... are you telling me that porsche doesn't have access to the same financial capital that Ferrari does???? I think they have plenty of money to compete in F1 (if they only thought they could succeed). Hell, they better have more money than Ferrari... afterall, they only sell a few thousand more cars per year than Ferrari does. And do you know what?? Each and every one that they sell looks like the same mass-produced piece of crap. They all look the same... they don't have any distinct features that differentiate themselves, nor do they have an iota of beauty that Ferrari's have.

    You wrote, "Look at how many time mclaren win the f1 championship and CRY!!"
    Last time I checked, Ferrari won the Constructor's Championship 11 times and Mclaren won it 8 times. Now I'm no rocket scientist, but I think that 11 is greater than 8.

    You wrote, "look at the lamborghini murceliago,it beat all the ferrari(and the f50 of course)with a price 2 time less expensive!!!."Case closed"
    I applaud Lamborghini for making a new car... it took them long enough. They were only making the Diablo for like 11 years i think. But again you are comparing a 2001 car to a 1995 car. Of course the technology improves over a 6 year time period. I'm not gonna sit here and tell you that the F50 still will be the best car in 2022... of course it won't be.
    But honestly, I do not like the design of the lamborghini. It does not evoke the same passion that Ferraris do. And yes, you are right when you say that it costs less than the F50, but that has more to do with their market penetration strategy than it does with quality. Take some business courses at WHARTON and maybe you will learn this stuff.


    You also wrote, "If Ferrari is so great in F1,why they don't built an ultimate road car like the mclaren F1????Maybe because they can't built a car with performance like this!!!"
    I think you underestimate how good the F60 is gonna be. I don't know its final specs and neither do you... but regardless of its final numbers for horsepower, top speed, etc, there is no doubt in my mind that it can challenge any car in the world.
    Furthermore, I don't believe that Ferrari has anything to prove to anyone with respect to supercar production. They don't need to make the "world's fastest road car" to benefit their brand image. They already have the heritage to beat everyone. They do not care about people like you who only judge cars based on performance #'s. They care more about making breathtaking cars that evoke passion, mystique, and glory. And that is something that Mclaren and Porsche are not capable of and will never be capable of ever.

    Ferrari Forever


     

Share This Page