1
All Forums > 2007 BMW M6 Cabriolet > Not really > Post Reply
Post #1 Fri, Jun 23, 2:28 PM
Sniperhail
Senior Member - 226

Nice car, but in no way is this a competitor for the SL65 AMG as suggested on the homepage. This is quick and powerful, but you can't compete against a car with double the torque and over a hundred extra ponies.
Post #2 Sat, Jun 24, 6:00 PM
Tuning06
New User - 39

yeh but the SL65 weighs almost 2000 kgs
Ayrton Senna lives forever

Post #3 Wed, Jun 28, 3:13 AM
YoungJae
Supercar Guru - 578

Let's think now of the two cars. Not only is this car lighter, but the gears are at an advantage and it is of superior handling. It'd be close, since the SL65 is no easy car at all to compete against, but I'd give this the slighter prop.
My ideal garage (10): 1995 McLaren F1 LM, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR, 1990 Lamborghini LM 002 Americana Estate Paris Dakar, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo Coatl, 2005 Gemballa Mirage GT, 2000 Hamann M Roadster, 2004 Hamann HM 7.0, 2005 NISMO R34 GT-R Z-tune, 2005 Maserati MC12, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 w/open exhausts

Post #4 Fri, Sep 29, 1:19 AM
Addict
New User - 84

I dont think so i think this can beat the SL65 AMG
Post #5 Sun, Jan 14, 8:02 AM
GTFord
Supercar Messiah - 1447

nice car


The sound of the Ferrari F430 Spiders 483-bhp V-8 screaming towards its 8500-rpm redline is nothing less than an orgasm for the ears. - dupont registy

Post #6 Sat, Jun 2, 5:37 AM
Timmy T
New User - 97

Not bad though.However, Hrdtop is better.And SL65, well, is wAy better!
Post #7 Sun, Jun 22, 7:14 AM
hvvlot
Member - 64

the sl65 in a drag race will win but not on a track. if you check the top gear video of the bmw m3, cl63 amg, and audi rs4 you will get an idea of this. i know its not an exact comparison but its close enough. think of the m3 as a baby m6 and the cl63 as a baby sl65.
Posted: Today
Superbot


Posted: Today
Superbot


All Forums > 2007 BMW M6 Cabriolet > Not really > Post Reply
1