|
1
2
[Last >>]
|
|
|
|
|
Post #1 Tue, Jul 22, 11:43 AM |
|
F50_Rulez
Senior Member - 453
 |
Do you rather have the Ford GT90 or Ferrari F50?
From now on I'm just gonna be like the rest of you.
|
|
Post #2 Mon, Jul 28, 12:03 PM |
|
eamh2003
Member - 142
 |
This would rape it if it had right setup on track. I saw a vid with some supercars and Porsche 911 GT2 was almost glued to F50's bumper...
Mazda 787B. Idle like a Dragster revving like a Formula
|
|
Post #3 Sat, Aug 2, 6:39 AM |
|
ZX12R
Supercar Messiah - 2715
 |
I'd rather have the GT-90
|
|
Post #4 Sun, Nov 2, 2:01 PM |
|
weallfollowmanutd
New Member - 9
 |
No it wouldn'd rape, or how you put it because the wheelbase/engine characteristics are all wrong and everyone who tested it wouldn't take it past 50 around a fast bent because it had no handling!
|
|
Post #5 Sun, Dec 7, 9:11 PM |
|
supercarfreak123
Jammin - 22317
 |
although this is a nice car ill take the ferrari because ferrari is an eperienced supercar maker however ford is used to making cars that sell for$ 14,000 not cars that r in the 100 grand and up range
|
|
Post #6 Sun, Dec 7, 9:12 PM |
|
supercarfreak123
Jammin - 22317
 |
Well ill take the ferrari because ferrari is an experienced supercar maker however ford is used to making $14,000 cars not cars that r in the 200 grand and up range
|
|
Post #7 Sat, Dec 13, 9:09 PM |
|
Inline6 DOHC
Member - 72
 |
Definatly the GT90...no contest...I mean the F-50 is nice and all but this thing looks way ahead of its time and I really like it. But its still not a Ferrari
He who judges a book by its cover will soon be staring at the tail lights.
Definition of R!cer: All Show, No Go
|
|
Post #8 Sat, Dec 27, 5:29 PM |
|
Ramdex
Member - 211
 |
well seeing that this car was never tried out and it only used 2 gears to get around 100 meters i would go the F50
Stay [sic] Pimp
|
|
Post #9 Mon, Dec 29, 3:13 PM |
|
Password please
Supercar Messiah - 6408
 |
Although the F50 would definitely be faster (better acceleration, better handling, based on the dimensions, characteristics, and weight distribution this thing would suffer from lots of understeer), I think I'd rather take this car, just to have something that nobody else does.
(insert witty innuendo here)
|
|
Post #10 Fri, Jan 2, 11:26 AM |
|
gt90man
New Member - 3
 |
the gt90 is way better its proven to be in performence and stats
|
|
Post #11 Wed, Jan 7, 1:46 AM |
|
Password please
Supercar Messiah - 6408
 |
On what? Need for Speed? In real life however, this is not faster.
(insert witty innuendo here)
|
|
Post #12 Fri, Jan 9, 10:11 PM |
|
Italian Stallion GTI
Member - 120
 |
Yah the gt90 is faster and it does look amazing ... but i dunno we are comparing a ford to a Ferrari
F-50 ! ! !
FORZA ITALIA
|
|
Post #13 Sun, Jan 11, 3:04 PM |
|
schwa197
New Member - 17
 |
probably this... if the posted times are correct this would be faster, but are they correct? cloes call on what i would take, maybe ferrari just for the name
|
|
Post #14 Fri, Jan 23, 8:45 PM |
|
MasterCobra
Supercar Messi - 2147
 |
ok, first of all, this car has been PROVEN to go over 235 mph. Second of all, just cuz its a Ford, doesnt mean it's worse than a Ferrari. After all, who walked over Ferrari at Le Mans in the 60s? Ford, even when the GT40 was old it STILL anhialated the newer Ferraris. This definately in terms of speed. However, this car was probably made as an exaple to prove what type of engineering Ford was capable of. It had tiles in the engine bay similar to those on the Space Shuttle to withstand the immense heat. It also featured a one-of-a-kind engine block, (two I-6's forged together). It ALSO had some sort of sonar system to warn the driver about walls and stuff in his blind spot (similar to what you would find on expensive luxury cars/SUVs of today). This car was simply for show, but show it does.
Proud owner of a 1967 Mustang
|
|
Post #15 Sat, Jan 24, 5:52 PM |
|
Password please
Supercar Messiah - 6408
 |
Ok, when and where was a running version of this car tested then?
(insert witty innuendo here)
|
|
Post #16 Sun, Jan 25, 1:44 PM |
|
MasterCobra
Supercar Messi - 2147
 |
My bad, he engine was made of 2 V-8s which had 2 cylinders chopped off each and then fused together. THat was what i had initally found out but recently i went to another provate site and read that it was two I-6's forged together. Either way, go to any GT90 site and they'll tell u that its reached up to and possibly above 235. You wanna know their sources? Ask the owners of the sites.
Proud owner of a 1967 Mustang
|
|
Post #17 Mon, Jan 26, 12:21 AM |
|
Password please
Supercar Messiah - 6408
 |
LOL, 235 is the speed it reached in NFS2, I think a lot of private sites claimed that based on the video game. From what I recall, this car was never tested beyond 190mph.
(insert witty innuendo here)
|
|
Post #18 Mon, Jan 26, 7:31 PM |
|
MasterCobra
Supercar Messi - 2147
 |
iono crap bout NFS, but im pretty sure this car CAN go past 235. And I bet these are from sources close to Ford as well. A car with 720 horses that gets 0-60 in 3.1 or such will likely have tall gears, thus the 235 MPH speed.
Proud owner of a 1967 Mustang
|
|
Post #19 Tue, Jan 27, 8:55 PM |
|
Password please
Supercar Messiah - 6408
 |
Well, sure, it's very possible, but I still don't think it's been tested to anywhere near that speed.
(insert witty innuendo here)
|
|
Post #20 Fri, Jan 30, 6:34 AM |
|
ojjvz
Senior Member - 164
 |
F50
Why do today what you can put off till tomorrow?
My top 5 cars:
1. '57/'58 Ferrari 250 Testrossa
2. '65/'66 Ford Mustang Shelby Cobra 427
3. '67 Ford Mustang Shelby Cobra GT500E Super Snake (AKA Eleanor)
4. Dodge Charger
5. Ford Mustang Shelby GR-1
|
|
Post #21 Sat, Feb 7, 12:08 PM |
|
MasterCobra
Supercar Messi - 2147
 |
either way, F50 for popularity, this for 1/4 mile performance.
Proud owner of a 1967 Mustang
|
|
Post #22 Thu, May 18, 11:12 AM |
|
ryn04
Member - 94
 |
Plus, the F50 doesn't look nearly as interesting as this.
|
|
Post #23 Sat, Oct 14, 5:41 AM |
|
RIO
New User - 1
 |
Ford RULEZZZZ!!! Super exterior! 720bhp vs 513bhp 378kph vs 325kph 5.9L vs 4.7L
|
|
Post #24 Sat, Nov 18, 7:07 PM |
|
arclight
Supercar Messi - 2432
 |
this for performance but work on the looks a little.
|
|
Post #25 Sat, May 19, 12:44 AM |
|
ryn04
Member - 94
 |
Quote from arclight this for performance but work on the looks a little.
The looks are perfect, a testament to futuristic design.
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
| All Forums > 1995 Ford GT90 Concept > This car or Ferrari F50? > Post Reply |
|
1
2
[Newer >>]
|
|